Home arrow News arrow War on Terror arrow "US Terror Attack"? Ninety Days at Most!
"US Terror Attack"? Ninety Days at Most! PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 06 August 2007

Juval AvivJuval Aviv, the former Israeli intelligence officer on who the film "Munich" is based, is one of a select number of people who predict America is about to become once again victim to a terror attack. Is it scaremongering, or a heads up?

Aviv has a track record of predicting terrorist attacks - correctly. So when he is asked "Do you believe another terrorist attack is likely on American soil?", Aviv replied on FOX News: "I predict, based primarily on information that is floating in Europe and the Middle East, that an event is imminent and around the corner here in the United States. It could happen as soon as tomorrow, or it could happen in the next few months. Ninety days at the most."
Aviv believes that once again, as on 9/11 or 7/7 in London, mass transportation will be the focus of the next attack. Asked, "What portion of the American infrastructure do you believe is at the greatest risk for a terror attack?", his response was: "We have put all of our emphasis, right or wrong, on the aviation area. What has happened, in the last two to three years, based on information we have, is the terrorists have realized that they cannot hijack a plane in America soon because the passengers are going to fight back. So they realize what they have been very successful with over the last 50 years in Madrid, London, Iraq, Israel: demoralizing the public when they go to work and when they come back from work."
Aviv offers a detailed scenario: "What they're going to do is hit six, seven or eight cities simultaneously to show sophistication and really hit the public. This time, which is the message of the day, it will not only be big cities. They're going to try to hit rural America. They want to send a message to rural America: 'You're not protected. If you figured out that if you just move out of New York and move to Montana or to Pittsburgh, you're not immune. We're going [to] get you wherever we can and it's easier there than in New York.'"

Staying Safe, by Juval AvivAviv was Golda Meir's bodyguard and she appointed him to track down and bring to justice the Palestinian terrorists who took the Israeli athletes hostage and killed them during the 1972 Munich Olympic Games.
He predicted the 2005 London subway bombing on the Bill O'Reilly show on Fox News stating publicly that it would happen within a week. O'Reilly laughed and mocked him saying that in a week he wanted him back on the show and unfortunately; within a week the terrorist attack occurred.
Juval Aviv states that he also gave intelligence to the Bush Administration about 9/11 a month before it occurred. His report specifically said they would use planes as bombs and target high profile buildings and monuments. The Administration ridiculed him and refused to respond. Congress has since hired him as a security consultant, but still the Administration does not listen to him. He did a test for Congress, putting an empty briefcase in five major spots in five US cities. Not one person called 911 or sought a policeman to check it out. In fact, in Chicago, someone tried to steal it!

For anyone assuming Aviv is still in the employ of Mossad, and all of this foreknowledge is a clear sign of Mossad having a hand in 9/11 and 7/7, Aviv is nevertheless not your typical "false flag operative": he thinks Iraq should never have been invaded.
The approach towards those responsible for the Munich kidnapping was that you bring justice to the terrorists, but one does not take down civilians; killing civilians only creates more terrorists. He feels that this ideology, formulated by his boss Golda Meir in 1972, has since largely been lacking from world leaders, including Israeli politicians. He feels that Israel's greatest mistake against their war on terror was to invade the West Bank and Gaza and stay there... showing parallels with the mistakes he feels the Bush Administration has made in Iraq.

Equally intriguingly, Aviv addressed another topic that recently was aired in the US, which was scaremongering that the US was going to fall victim to a nuclear attack.
Aviv believes that terrorists who want to destroy America will not use sophisticated weapons - they like suicide as the frontline approach.
So where does this leave his predictions? Aviv says his information is well known in intelligence circles, but the US government does not want to alarm Americans. Intriguingly, he also said that Bush will attack Iran and Syria before he leaves office. Since the US doesn't have enough troops to carry out an invasion a la Iraq, Bush will likely use small, strategic nuclear weapons regardless that the headlines the next day will read "US Nukes Islamic World" and the world will be a different place to such an extent that global warming will be irrelevant. Indeed, if the US nukes the Islamic World, the world will be a different place, and apocalyptic headlines could begin to rule the front pages of the newspapers. Bush said he would leave his successor - whoever that was - no choice, and this scenario corresponds to that reality.

 
< Prev   Next >

Proof of Verification

© 2008 Conspiracy Times

Advertisement